tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5796881.post8460348365285984634..comments2023-10-25T01:25:43.905-07:00Comments on Reverend0's Pulpit: VisitorsAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13108008395721447860noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5796881.post-75984082536074725992009-05-24T09:18:41.464-07:002009-05-24T09:18:41.464-07:00I am curious to read the others. I do believe tha...I am curious to read the others. I do believe that allowing your reader to postulate about concepts and mysteries makes a better book, but if you ever go about solving it, your readers will be pissed.<br /><br />I found that to be true in the Neal Asher story I just read. What my mind pictured was so much more grand than what the story delivered. That said, if an author can delivery big and broad, then the telling of that story becomes awesome.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13108008395721447860noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5796881.post-7959604136700165962009-05-12T14:19:00.000-07:002009-05-12T14:19:00.000-07:00I still can't decide if knowing what Rama was for ...I still can't decide if knowing what Rama was for (explained over 3 sequels with Gentry Lee) ruins or enhances the enigma that is the first book.The Really Sarcastic Weaselhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08087081611974367590noreply@blogger.com